If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is usually only completed In the event the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence along with the petitioner company responded for the allegations as a result they were properly aware of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to generally be seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Case regulation is specific for the jurisdiction in which it absolutely was rendered. For example, a ruling inside of a California appellate court would not generally be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Because the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been reached, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that may very well be consulted in deciding a current case. It might be used to guide the court, but isn't binding precedent.
Unfortunately, that wasn't genuine. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son told his parents that the boy had molested him. The boy was arrested two times later, and admitted to possessing sexually molested the pair’s son several times.
a hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
PLR is often a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject matter: Appeal At times it's practical for any Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation for making an attempt to dispose of a case on merit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's attained to a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for merit disposal when it's achieved this kind of stage. Read more
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling over the same sort of case.
Are you looking for Court Information? You can utilize our site to search to get a case or search for any person. Information within the site is updated every 24 hours at three:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found within the search site is provided to be used as reference material and is not the official court record.
Undertaking a case regulation search could be as easy as entering specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case regulation searches, such as:
Summaries of cases that shape the lives of younger individuals, making certain a further understanding of justice within the juvenile system. Knowledge that matters, crafted for legal professionals and fans alike.
Preceding 4 tax years interpreted. It isn't from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, it is also a nicely-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor read more proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is topic for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.